Redundancy and Dismissal Procedures
How to Avoid Unfair Dismissal Claims in UK SMEs
12/03/2026 · 10 min read · By Blackwell Advisory Editorial
What actually triggers an unfair dismissal claim?
Most unfair dismissal claims are not decided by whether the employer had a valid concern. They are decided by whether the employer followed a fair process. That procedural gap is where SMEs most often lose otherwise defensible cases.
Employees with two or more years' service can usually bring unfair dismissal claims, with important exceptions for automatically unfair reasons such as whistleblowing, pregnancy, and asserting statutory rights.
Tribunals assess whether your decision sat within the range of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer. Good grounds handled badly still produce liability.
Common procedural failures that increase tribunal exposure
Patterns are consistent across SME claims: no adequate warning before final warning, investigations without reliable notes, pre-judged outcomes before formal hearing, no meaningful appeal stage, and inconsistent treatment across teams.
These failures are avoidable when managers use a documented process and escalate early in potentially contentious cases.
- Skipping investigation or running it informally
- Issuing dismissal outcomes without clear written reasons
- Failing to offer a right of appeal
- Treating similar conduct differently without explanation
The minimum process controls every SME needs
Start with a current disciplinary and grievance policy aligned with the ACAS Code of Practice. Non-compliance can increase awards by up to 25%.
Investigation should be proportionate but genuine: gather facts, interview relevant people, keep contemporaneous notes, and document findings before any hearing takes place.
Outcome letters must hold up under scrutiny. They should state the reason for decision, evidence relied upon, expectations (where relevant), and appeal rights.
- A compliant disciplinary and grievance policy
- Documented investigation standard
- Consistent hearing and decision templates
- A mandatory internal review before dismissal is confirmed
Manager behaviour is a legal control
Line managers often make sensitive people decisions under time pressure. Without clear guardrails, they improvise — and that creates legal exposure quickly.
The practical solution is not over-complex training. It is disciplined escalation. Any matter likely to lead to formal warning or dismissal should trigger internal review before action.
Consistency across the workforce is equally important. If one employee is dismissed for conduct another received an informal warning for, you need a clear, documented reason for that difference.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does an employee need two years' service to bring an unfair dismissal claim?+
Generally yes, but important exceptions apply for automatically unfair reasons such as whistleblowing, pregnancy, and asserting statutory rights.
Can I dismiss someone during probation without process?+
You can dismiss during probation, but a basic fair process is still recommended, including a chance to respond and a right of appeal.
What happens if I do not offer a right of appeal?+
Failure to offer appeal is a procedural breach under the ACAS Code and can contribute to unfair dismissal findings and compensation uplift.
What counts as gross misconduct?+
Gross misconduct is serious conduct that may justify dismissal without notice, such as theft, fraud, violence, or serious confidentiality breach, and should be defined clearly in policy.
Need clarity on your current risk position?
Book a short call and we’ll outline practical next steps for your business.
Book a Discovery Call